lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1398306278.29638.42.camel@jtkirshe-mobl>
Date:	Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:24:38 -0700
From:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>,
	Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 11:47 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_mac.c between commit c5ffe7e1f745
> ("e1000e/igb/ixgbe/i40e: fix message terminations") from the net tree
> and
> commit c75c4edfc38d ("igb: Cleanups for messaging") from the net-next
> tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (the former was a superset of the latter) and can carry
> the
> fix as necessary (no action is required).

Huh, I thought the commit c75c4edfc38d ("igb: Cleanups for messaging")
in Dave's net-next already took into account the changes in net.  I will
take a look at your fix Stephen, thanks for letting us know.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ