[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1398376829-6771-25-git-send-email-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:00:27 +0200
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...gutronix.de, Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 24/26] can: sja1000_isa: add locking for indirect register access mode
From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
When accessing the SJA1000 controller registers in the indirect access mode,
writing the register number and reading/writing the data has to be an atomic
attempt.
As the sja1000_isa driver is an old style driver with a fixed number of
instances the locking variable depends on the same index like all the other
configuration elements given on the module command line.
As a positive side effect dev->dev_id is populated by the instance index,
which was missing in 3e66d0138c05d9 ("can: populate netdev::dev_id for udev
discrimination").
Reported-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
---
drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_isa.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_isa.c b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_isa.c
index df136a2..014695d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_isa.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000_isa.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ static int clk[MAXDEV];
static unsigned char cdr[MAXDEV] = {[0 ... (MAXDEV - 1)] = 0xff};
static unsigned char ocr[MAXDEV] = {[0 ... (MAXDEV - 1)] = 0xff};
static int indirect[MAXDEV] = {[0 ... (MAXDEV - 1)] = -1};
+static spinlock_t indirect_lock[MAXDEV]; /* lock for indirect access mode */
module_param_array(port, ulong, NULL, S_IRUGO);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(port, "I/O port number");
@@ -101,19 +102,26 @@ static void sja1000_isa_port_write_reg(const struct sja1000_priv *priv,
static u8 sja1000_isa_port_read_reg_indirect(const struct sja1000_priv *priv,
int reg)
{
- unsigned long base = (unsigned long)priv->reg_base;
+ unsigned long flags, base = (unsigned long)priv->reg_base;
+ u8 readval;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&indirect_lock[priv->dev->dev_id], flags);
outb(reg, base);
- return inb(base + 1);
+ readval = inb(base + 1);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&indirect_lock[priv->dev->dev_id], flags);
+
+ return readval;
}
static void sja1000_isa_port_write_reg_indirect(const struct sja1000_priv *priv,
int reg, u8 val)
{
- unsigned long base = (unsigned long)priv->reg_base;
+ unsigned long flags, base = (unsigned long)priv->reg_base;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&indirect_lock[priv->dev->dev_id], flags);
outb(reg, base);
outb(val, base + 1);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&indirect_lock[priv->dev->dev_id], flags);
}
static int sja1000_isa_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -169,6 +177,7 @@ static int sja1000_isa_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (iosize == SJA1000_IOSIZE_INDIRECT) {
priv->read_reg = sja1000_isa_port_read_reg_indirect;
priv->write_reg = sja1000_isa_port_write_reg_indirect;
+ spin_lock_init(&indirect_lock[idx]);
} else {
priv->read_reg = sja1000_isa_port_read_reg;
priv->write_reg = sja1000_isa_port_write_reg;
@@ -198,6 +207,7 @@ static int sja1000_isa_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dev);
SET_NETDEV_DEV(dev, &pdev->dev);
+ dev->dev_id = idx;
err = register_sja1000dev(dev);
if (err) {
--
1.9.0.279.gdc9e3eb
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists