netdev - Re: [patch net-next] vlan: Don't allow vlan devices to change network namespaces.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 24 Apr 2014 09:01:26 +0200
From:	Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To:	Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@...e.cz>,
	chenweilong <chenweilong@...wei.com>
CC:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, kaber@...sh.net,
	davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch net-next] vlan: Don't allow vlan devices to change network
 namespaces.

Le 24/04/2014 07:47, Michal Kubecek a écrit :
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 08:59:51AM +0800, chenweilong wrote:
>> On 2014/4/23 15:23, Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>>> Le 23/04/2014 04:40, chenweilong a écrit :
>>>> And, 2) is not safe, if someone forgets to move eth1, eth1.5 will not work, making
>>>> things complex.
>>> We have to fix this case, because it is a valid use case to have eth1.5 in net0
>>> and eth1 in another ns.
>>>
>> eth1.5 can receive and send packets in net0, the problem is you can't add a new eth1.5
>> in old ns, report 'error: File exists'.
>
> And this is correct, as far as I can tell. If it was possible, which of
> the two interfaces would receive VLAN tagged packets with VID 5 coming
> to eth1?
I agree, this is the correct behavior.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html