[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <60A73B7A161A82449A7DB7B382BFD15537026F76@SZXEMA504-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 11:50:24 +0000
From: "Zhangjie (HZ)" <zhangjie14@...wei.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: "jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
Qinchuanyu <qinchuanyu@...wei.com>,
Liuyongan <liuyongan@...wei.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Change dev->needed_headroom of virtio_net to make
Patch"virtio-net: put virtio net header inline with data"work better
Thank you very much!
I will post a patch tomorrow.
--Best wishes!
//Zhang Jie
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:mst@...hat.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 7:45 PM
To: Zhangjie (HZ)
Cc: jasowang@...hat.com; Qinchuanyu; Liuyongan; kvm@...r.kernel.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Change dev->needed_headroom of virtio_net to make Patch"virtio-net: put virtio net header inline with data"work better
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:19:58AM +0000, Zhangjie (HZ) wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Patch “virtio-net: put virtio net header inline with data” , has a
> notable improvement for TCP packages.
>
> But UDP packages from virtio_net nic, do not have enough head room. I
> wonder if we can set dev->needed_headroom
>
> to the size of virtio net header, so as to put the header in. By doing
> this, udp get about 5% improvement in bandwidth.
Sounds like a reasonable thing to do.
Want to post the patch so people can try it out?
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
> //Zhang Jie
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists