lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 13:41:17 -0700 From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com> Subject: Re: [Patch net] sched, cls: check if we could overwrite actions when changing a filter On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> wrote: > On 04/24/14 17:12, Cong Wang wrote: >> >> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:30 AM, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> I dont see what you are seeing. However, some quick tests will prove it. >>> Example go from 1->3 actions and backwards 3->1 actions. >>> I.e create a policy with (handwave) 3 actions and replace it with >>> another that has only one action. Do this while you are sending a >>> ping exercising this policy. >>> I can see how yours with 1->0 and 0->1 will work. >> >> >> See below (with this patch applied): >> > > Ok, thanks Cong. Since you are using this in your system already, > I am assuming it is tested with running traffic at the same time. Yes I did. > > Please resubmit the patch with my signed off as well.. > OK, and will rebase it on net-next since it is not an urgent issue. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists