netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC] ipv6_fib limit spinlock hold times for /proc/net/ipv6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140425213140.GE7050@order.stressinduktion.org>
Date:	Fri, 25 Apr 2014 23:31:40 +0200
From:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
To:	Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] ipv6_fib limit spinlock hold times for /proc/net/ipv6_route

On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:41:11AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> I was going to discuss the cache exclusion on a separate thread, but the 
> short version is that I don't have any clue of how many people we'd 
> upset by unconditionally leaving out the cached entries.

In my opinion this would be ok.

We definitely must reduce number of entries in the fib and I don't think it is
wise to synthesize them thereafter, especially if we don't need to track state
at all, e.g. forwarding.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html