[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1398555606.29914.111.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 16:40:06 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipv6: Set flow label to skb_hash on transmit
On Sat, 2014-04-26 at 16:00 -0700, Tom Herbert wrote:
>
> +static inline __be32 ip6_make_flowlabel(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb,
> + __be32 flowlabel)
> +{
> + __be32 hash;
> +
> + if (flowlabel || !net->ipv6.sysctl.auto_flowlabels)
> + return flowlabel;
> +
> + hash = skb->sk && skb->sk->sk_hash ? skb->sk->sk_hash :
> + skb_get_hash_raw(skb);
> +
> + return hash & IPV6_FLOWLABEL_MASK;
> +}
Hmm...
We use jhash and a random perturb to generate sk_hash which serves as
our input to locate sockets in hash table.
If we leak sk_hash, an attacker can easily target one hash slot.
You could simply use :
hash = skb->sk ? hash_ptr(skb->sk, 20) : skb_get_hash_raw(skb);
But even with this, we could leak sensitive information...
So I would rather use a separate sk->sk_flowhash value, and put a
completely random value in it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists