[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <110350591.Or1QOkkWy1@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2014 09:57:24 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, robh+dt@...nel.org, pawel.moll@....com,
mark.rutland@....com, ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk,
galak@...eaurora.org, f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] Documentation: add Device tree bindings for QCA7000
On Tuesday 29 April 2014 08:30:47 Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Am 28.04.2014 21:57, schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
> > On Monday 28 April 2014 19:54:56 Stefan Wahren wrote:
> >> This patch adds the Device tree bindings for the Ethernet over SPI
> >> protocol driver of the Qualcomm QCA7000 HomePlug GreenPHY.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
> >> ---
> >> .../devicetree/bindings/net/qca-qca7000-spi.txt | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+)
> >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qca-qca7000-spi.txt
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qca-qca7000-spi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qca-qca7000-spi.txt
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..132c10f
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/qca-qca7000-spi.txt
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
> >> +* Qualcomm QCA7000 (Ethernet over SPI protocol)
> >> +
> >> +Note: The QCA7000 is useable as a SPI device. In this case it must be defined
> >> +as a child of a spi master in the device tree.
> >> +
> >> +Required properties:
> >> +- compatible : Should be "qca,qca7000"
> >> +- reg : Should specify the SPI chip select
> >> +- intr-gpios : Should specify the GPIO for SPI interrupt
> >> +- spi-cpha : Must be set
> >> +- spi-cpol: Must be set
> > Why specify the interrupt as a GPIO line, rather than an 'interrupts' property?
> >
> > Arnd
> >
>
> i thought the extra interrupt line must be defined as a GPIO. I will fix
> that.
If all you need is an interrupt, it's better to define it that way.
> Is the rest of the bindings ok?
Looks ok to me. Other reviewers may have more comments.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists