lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 13:34:10 -0400 (EDT) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: kys@...rosoft.com Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...uxdriverproject.org, olaf@...fle.de, apw@...onical.com, jasowang@...hat.com, stable@...nel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next 1/1] hyperv: Properly handle checksum offload From: "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2014 09:05:21 -0700 > Do checksum offload only if the client of the driver wants checksum to be > offloaded. > > In V1 version of this patch, I addressed comments from > Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org> and > Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>. > > In this version of the patch I have addressed comments from > David Miller. > > This patch fixes a bug that is exposed in gateway scenarios. > > > Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com> > Reviewed-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com> It does not make any sense to submit a patch for net-next and also ask for it to be included in -stable. First of all, -stable submissions are handled by me directly for networking. Therefore you should not CC: stable on such patches, instead you ask me politly to include it in my stable submission queue. Second of all, if a patch is destined for stable, it should be submitted for 'net' not 'net-next'. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists