[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1398948716-6765-3-git-send-email-ogerlitz@mellanox.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 15:51:54 +0300
From: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, roland@...nel.org,
jackm@....mellanox.co.il, matanb@...lanox.com, amirv@...lanox.com,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 2/4] net/mlx4_core: Fix slave id computation for single port VF
From: Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>
The code that deals with computing the slave id based on a given GID
gave wrong results when the number of single port VFs wasn't the
same for port 1 vs. port 2 and the relevant VF is single ported on
port 2. As a result, incoming CM MADs were dispatched to the wrong VF.
Fixed that and added documentation to clarify the computation steps.
Fixes: 449fc48 ('net/mlx4: Adapt code for N-Port VF')
Signed-off-by: Matan Barak <matanb@...lanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/port.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++------------
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/port.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/port.c
index cfcad26..b5b3549 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/port.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/port.c
@@ -1106,6 +1106,9 @@ int mlx4_get_slave_from_roce_gid(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int port, u8 *gid,
}
if (found_ix >= 0) {
+ /* Calculate a slave_gid which is the slave number in the gid
+ * table and not a globally unique slave number.
+ */
if (found_ix < MLX4_ROCE_PF_GIDS)
slave_gid = 0;
else if (found_ix < MLX4_ROCE_PF_GIDS + (vf_gids % num_vfs) *
@@ -1118,41 +1121,43 @@ int mlx4_get_slave_from_roce_gid(struct mlx4_dev *dev, int port, u8 *gid,
((vf_gids % num_vfs) * ((vf_gids / num_vfs + 1)))) /
(vf_gids / num_vfs)) + vf_gids % num_vfs + 1;
+ /* Calculate the globally unique slave id */
if (slave_gid) {
struct mlx4_active_ports exclusive_ports;
struct mlx4_active_ports actv_ports;
struct mlx4_slaves_pport slaves_pport_actv;
unsigned max_port_p_one;
- int num_slaves_before = 1;
+ int num_vfs_before = 0;
+ int candidate_slave_gid;
+ /* Calculate how many VFs are on the previous port, if exists */
for (i = 1; i < port; i++) {
bitmap_zero(exclusive_ports.ports, dev->caps.num_ports);
- set_bit(i, exclusive_ports.ports);
+ set_bit(i - 1, exclusive_ports.ports);
slaves_pport_actv =
mlx4_phys_to_slaves_pport_actv(
dev, &exclusive_ports);
- num_slaves_before += bitmap_weight(
+ num_vfs_before += bitmap_weight(
slaves_pport_actv.slaves,
dev->num_vfs + 1);
}
- if (slave_gid < num_slaves_before) {
- bitmap_zero(exclusive_ports.ports, dev->caps.num_ports);
- set_bit(port - 1, exclusive_ports.ports);
- slaves_pport_actv =
- mlx4_phys_to_slaves_pport_actv(
- dev, &exclusive_ports);
- slave_gid += bitmap_weight(
- slaves_pport_actv.slaves,
- dev->num_vfs + 1) -
- num_slaves_before;
- }
- actv_ports = mlx4_get_active_ports(dev, slave_gid);
+ /* candidate_slave_gid isn't necessarily the correct slave, but
+ * it has the same number of ports and is assigned to the same
+ * ports as the real slave we're looking for. On dual port VF,
+ * slave_gid = [single port VFs on port <port>] +
+ * [offset of the current slave from the first dual port VF] +
+ * 1 (for the PF).
+ */
+ candidate_slave_gid = slave_gid + num_vfs_before;
+
+ actv_ports = mlx4_get_active_ports(dev, candidate_slave_gid);
max_port_p_one = find_first_bit(
actv_ports.ports, dev->caps.num_ports) +
bitmap_weight(actv_ports.ports,
dev->caps.num_ports) + 1;
+ /* Calculate the real slave number */
for (i = 1; i < max_port_p_one; i++) {
if (i == port)
continue;
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists