[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53627319.8010902@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 09:15:21 -0700
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: edumazet@...gle.com, vtlam@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [net PATCH] net: sched: lock imbalance in hhf qdisc
On 05/01/2014 08:30 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 08:15 -0700, John Fastabend wrote:
>> hhf_change() takes the sch_tree_lock and releases it but misses the error
>> cases. Fix the missed case here.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>
>> ---
>> net/sched/sch_hhf.c | 4 +++-
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/net/sched/sch_hhf.c b/net/sched/sch_hhf.c
>> index edee03d..1803f89 100644
>> --- a/net/sched/sch_hhf.c
>> +++ b/net/sched/sch_hhf.c
>> @@ -565,8 +565,10 @@ static int hhf_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt)
>> new_hhf_non_hh_weight = nla_get_u32(tb[TCA_HHF_NON_HH_WEIGHT]);
>>
>> non_hh_quantum = (u64)new_quantum * new_hhf_non_hh_weight;
>> - if (non_hh_quantum > INT_MAX)
>> + if (non_hh_quantum > INT_MAX) {
>> + sch_tree_unlock(sch);
>> return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> q->quantum = new_quantum;
>> q->hhf_non_hh_weight = new_hhf_non_hh_weight;
>>
>
> Good catch, could you refactor a bit more to do all checks before any
> change ?
Sure. What you have below looks good. I'll submit an official v2 patch.
--
John Fastabend Intel Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists