[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1398964810.29914.200.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 10:20:10 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, ast@...mgrid.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] net: filter: simplify label names from
jump-table
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 18:16 +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> This patch simplifies label naming for the BPF jump-table.
> When we define labels via DL(), we just concatenate/textify
> the combination of instruction opcode which consists of the
> class, subclass, word size, target register and so on. Each
> time we leave BPF_ prefix intact, so that e.g. the preprocessor
> generates a label BPF_ALU_BPF_ADD_BPF_X for DL(BPF_ALU, BPF_ADD,
> BPF_X) whereas a label name of ALU_ADD_X is much more easy
> to grasp. Pure cleanup only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
> ---
This exactly makes harder to use grep and future code reviews.
# git grep -n BPF_XADD
include/linux/filter.h:21:#define BPF_XADD 0xc0 /* exclusive add */
net/core/filter.c:224: DL(BPF_STX, BPF_XADD, BPF_W),
net/core/filter.c:225: DL(BPF_STX, BPF_XADD, BPF_DW),
net/core/filter.c:481: BPF_STX_BPF_XADD_BPF_W: /* lock xadd *(u32 *)(A + insn->off) += X */
net/core/filter.c:485: BPF_STX_BPF_XADD_BPF_DW: /* lock xadd *(u64 *)(A + insn->off) += X */
Compare now with :
# git grep -n XADD
So I am quite against this patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists