netdev - Re: [PATCH] jme: Fix DMA unmap warning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 7 May 2014 02:34:55 +0530 (IST)
From:	Govindarajulu Varadarajan <_govind@....com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
cc:	nhorman@...driver.com, _govind@....com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	cooldavid@...ldavid.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jme: Fix DMA unmap warning



On Tue, 6 May 2014, David Miller wrote:

> From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 16:50:46 -0400
>
>>>> +		ctxbi = txbi + ((startidx + j + 2) & (mask));
>>>> +		pci_unmap_page(jme->pdev,
>>>> +				ctxbi->mapping,
>>>> +				ctxbi->len,
>>>> +				PCI_DMA_TODEVICE);
>>>> +
>>>> +				ctxbi->mapping = 0;
>>>> +				ctxbi->len = 0;
>>>
>>> Alignment, a tab from 'for'
>> Not sure what you mean by this, I don't see any alignment errors above, or in my
>> tree.  Checkpatch also claims its clean.
>
> Indeed it is indented correctly, the "+" at the beginning of the line in
> the patch makes it look like it's not, but it is.
>

Hmm. This is how it looked when I applied the patch.
http://i.imgur.com/ZdjqJ3d.png

ctxbi->mapping = 0;
ctxbi->len = 0;

is aligned to '(' of pci_unmap_page. But these two statements are not arg of
the function. Shouldn't it be aligned along pci_unmap_page and not '('

Govind
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html