netdev - Re: [Patch net-next] net: rename local_df to ignore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHo-OozOEZHDDWnt5AjjCjJ3o88s5z0Ez2i53R=6senGCLDFPA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 7 May 2014 13:49:09 -0700
From:	Maciej Żenczykowski <zenczykowski@...il.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
	Linux NetDev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net-next] net: rename local_df to ignore_df

I've been wondering whether 'allow_frag' or 'allow_local_frag' or
'ignore_df_set' wouldn't be better names.

At some point we'll need to add a flag which does the opposite as well
(for locally generated tcp packets in non path mtu discovery mode),
'disallow_frag' or 'disallow_local_frag',  'force_df' or something
like that.  Picking two names which both are obvious and work well in
concert would be nice.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html