lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVo7ducU3S25Z_4NDB1p72pSLU0oLQh-ppxEWMgqYyjqQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 7 May 2014 16:01:33 -0700
From:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	"Jorge Boncompte [DTI2]" <jorge@...2.net>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
	Simo Sorce <ssorce@...hat.com>,
	"security@...nel.org" <security@...nel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] net: Use netlink_ns_capable to verify the permisions
 of netlink messages

On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 3:52 PM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
> Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 15:26:11 -0700
>
>> So what do we do?  Check permissions on connect and then use the
>> cached result for send on a connected socket?  Check permitted caps
>> instead of effective caps?
>
> It should create the socket after changing perms.

I agree that it should, but it doesn't, and if these patches get
backported, things will break.  OTOH, if the patches don't get
backported, things may still break, and we have a possibly rather
severe unfixed vulnerability.

--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ