[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bnv6lfig.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 16:05:27 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net] rtnetlink: call rtnl_lock_unregistering() in rtnl_link_unregister()
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> writes:
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 12:02 PM, Stephen Hemminger
> <stephen@...workplumber.org> wrote:
>> On Fri, 9 May 2014 11:10:36 -0700
>> Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> This can't be done without a macro (at least for me). Or
>>> we have to duplicate the code.
>>
>> macro method is too ugly, figure out a better way.
>
> That's what I am going to do for -net-next. This patch is for -net,
> it's an ugly but minimum change I can find.
>
> Of course, if you insist we should clean up it for -net as well,
> I can do that.
It would be no worse to rename the existing function
rtnl_lock_unregistering_list
And add a second function rtnl_lock_unregistering that does
the same thing but uses the global list.
Of course this begs the question what happens if the network
device we want to destroy is a network namespace that is currently
exiting and not on the global list.
It looks like we need to grab the net_mutex to get a state where network
namespaces are not exiting...
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists