netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] BPF testsuite and cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140512.002547.1104211599437826768.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 12 May 2014 00:25:47 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ast@...mgrid.com
Cc:	dborkman@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] BPF testsuite and cleanup

From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
Date: Thu,  8 May 2014 14:10:50 -0700

> This patchset adds BPF testsuite and improves readability of classic
> to internal BPF converter.
> 
> The testsuite helped to find 'negative offset bug' in x64 JIT that was
> fixed by commit fdfaf64e ("x86: bpf_jit: support negative offsets")
> 
> It can be very useful for classic and internal JIT compiler developers.
> Also it serves as performance benchmark.
> 
> x86_64/i386 pass all tests with and without JIT. arm32 JIT is failing
> negative offset tests which are unsupported.
> 
> Internal BPF tests are much larger than classic tests to cover different
> combinations of registers. Negative tests check correctness of classic
> BPF verifier which must reject them.

Series applied, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html