netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] net: add a sysctl to reflect the fwmark on replies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr07p7xujjsQU0OrtdL53i4FPX7+9BKV-pbVZH4LN6PpTA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 May 2014 02:44:33 +0900
From:	Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@...gle.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	JP Abgrall <jpa@...gle.com>, Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] net: add a sysctl to reflect the fwmark on replies

On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:52 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> These patches do not apply cleanly to net-next.
>
> Also, you did not provide a top level initial "[PATCH 0/N] " posting
> giving a high level overview of what these changes do, and why we
> should make these changes.

Ack. I just sent out a new patchset which should apply cleanly and has
a cover letter (the first submission had one, but patch v2 didn't).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html