netdev - Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] [PATCH net-next 4/5] ieee802154: don't ignore "to" argument in unbound dgram sendmsg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140513201340.GB12817@ws>
Date:	Tue, 13 May 2014 17:13:40 -0300
From:	Werner Almesberger <werner@...esberger.net>
To:	Phoebe Buckheister <phoebe.buckheister@...m.fraunhofer.de>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-zigbee-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Linux-zigbee-devel] [PATCH net-next 4/5] ieee802154: don't
 ignore "to" argument in unbound dgram sendmsg

Phoebe Buckheister wrote:
> For some reason, unconnected 802.15.4 dgram sockets ignore the destination
> argument of sendmsg(), while bound sockets use it. Instead, send packets
> to the destination given by the user, and default to the connected
> destination only if no explicit target is given.

We discussed this a bit on IRC. Here's what I think happened and what
happens with your patch. Before:

conn'ed	msg_nam	action
-------	-------	------------------------------------------
no	no	send to initialization value (= broadcast)
no	yes	idem
yes	no	send to connected address
yes	yes	idem

After your patch:

conn'ed	msg_nam	action
-------	-------	------------------------------------------
no	no	send to initialization value (= broadcast)
no	yes	send to msg_name
yes	no	send to connected address
yes	yes	send to msg_name

This is certainly more correct. Blurting out a broadcast in the
no/no case isn't nice, though. It would be better to return either
ENOTCONN (POSIX [1]) or (even better, according to GNU libc [2])
EDESTADDRREQ.

POSIX [1] says we may get EISCONN in the yes/yes case and the Linux
man page [3] says we either get EISCONN or the msg_name argument is
ignored. So that also doesn't look quite right yet.

- Werner

[1] http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/007904975/
[2] http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Error-Codes.html
[3] man sendmsg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html