netdev - Re: [PATCH ipsec 0/3] vti/vti6: minor tweaks + one fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140513084114.GZ32371@secunet.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 May 2014 10:41:14 +0200
From:	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:	Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
CC:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec 0/3] vti/vti6: minor tweaks + one fix

On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 11:43:39PM +0200, Mathias Krause wrote:
> Hi Steffen,
> 
> this series addresses a few issues related to VTI. The first patch fixes
> a bug in the vti6 module calling unregister_pernet_device() twice in the
> error path. That's probably material for ipsec.git.
> The second patch simplifies the error handling path in module init/fini
> of vti6. The third patch does the same for vti. Those two are probably
> material for ipsec-next.git as we're at -rc5 already. But I leave that
> decision to you.

Right, patches two and three should go to ipsec-next. But the second
patch does not apply without the first patch. Please send separate
patchsets for ipsec and ipsec-next in future.

Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html