netdev - Re: [next PATCH 0/5] net: tcp: DCTCP congestion control algorithm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPh34mf-nRwyA0LmSwJXy_e4yqMxZ2BEJFz+3LTW_Po91fY5fw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 May 2014 11:34:29 +0200
From:	Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@...u.net>
To:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>, lars@...app.com
Cc:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [next PATCH 0/5] net: tcp: DCTCP congestion control algorithm

Some IETF background: IETF Meeting 79 (Beijing) Microsoft employees
presented DCTCP with the intention to standardize DCTCP. The rough
consensus was the DCTCP is datacenter specific, thus closed door
technique and in the result not of broader interest for TCPM working
group. Further effort slowed down quickly.

Last IETF meeting in London (IETF 89) Lars Eggert (cc'ed him) picked
up DCTCP again. My impression was that the willing to adopt or work on
DCTCP was limited (the way I see it) but not definitely buried.

The IPR statement licence it under Royalty-Free, Reasonable and
Non-Discriminatory licence.

Hagen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html