[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1400100488.4788.3.camel@jekeller-desk1.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 20:48:08 +0000
From: "Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: "joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"gospo@...hat.com" <gospo@...hat.com>,
"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next 02/11] ixgbe: clean up checkpatch warnings about
CODE_INDENT and LEADING_SPACE
On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 09:25 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-05-14 at 01:54 -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
>
> trivial note:
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe.h
> []
> > @@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ struct ixgbe_ring_container {
> > for (pos = (head).ring; pos != NULL; pos = pos->next)
> >
> > #define MAX_RX_PACKET_BUFFERS ((adapter->flags & IXGBE_FLAG_DCB_ENABLED) \
> > - ? 8 : 1)
> > + ? 8 : 1)
>
> My preference would be to use a form that keeps the
> actual statement on a single line like:
>
> #define MAX_RX_PACKET_BUFFERS \
> (adapter->flags & IXGBE_FLAG_DCB_ENABLED ? 8 : 1)
>
> or if you really like parentheses
>
> #define MAX_RX_PACKET_BUFFERS \
> ((adapter->flags & IXGBE_FLAG_DCB_ENABLED) ? 8 : 1)
>
>
>
I agree, but this should be fixed in a follow-on patch, as I actually
automatically generated this by fixing leading space characters.
Thanks,
Jake
Powered by blists - more mailing lists