netdev - Re: [PATCH] use cond_resched() to replace udelay() when dump eeprom

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140514.005330.276486541596607753.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Wed, 14 May 2014 00:53:30 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	mchan@...adcom.com
Cc:	acho@...e.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpoirier@...e.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] use cond_resched() to replace udelay() when dump eeprom

From: Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 10:48:30 -0700

> We still need to time these commands.  Using cond_resched(), the timing
> becomes unpredictable.  Perhaps we can reduce the NVRAM_CMD_TIMEOUT
> counter by a factor of 100 and use msleep(1) instead of udelay(10).

That should work.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html