netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 5/9] bonding: create a macro for bond mode and use it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 15 May 2014 20:14:36 +0200
From:	Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>
To:	Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 5/9] bonding: create a macro for bond mode
 and use it

On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:51:51AM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com> wrote:
>
>>CC: Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>
>>CC: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>
>>Signed-off-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>
>>---
...snip...
>	Would it be better to use "bond_uses_primary(struct bonding *)"
>instead of the above?  That would simplify the above calling pattern,
>and shorten the calls elsewhere.  Maybe I missed one, but it looks like
>all of the calls to _uses_primary have BOND_MODE(bond) as the argument.

There's at least one call, when checking the params, where it checks the
int:

bond_main.c:
4271         if (primary && !bond_mode_uses_primary(bond_mode)) {

so, either we'll use something else here, or leave it with BOND_MODE()...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html