[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1400259027.7973.211.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 09:50:27 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Timo Teras <timo.teras@....fi>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Subject: Re: [bisected] [oops] gre/gro oops in skb_gro_receive+0x118/0x453
On Fri, 2014-05-16 at 19:40 +0300, Timo Teras wrote:
> Both the gre bound interface, and the inside interface are identical.
>
> And you are right. It might be driver / hw / gro capability specific
> issue. I had also report from a user using similar gre/ipsec/forwarding
> setup, that 3.13-stable kernels works on his hardware.
>
> Using unmodified in-tree r8169 module.
>
> Please let me know if additional information is needed.
What happens if you disable gro on eth0 ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists