netdev - Re: [Xen-devel] xen-netfront possibly rides the rocket too often

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140516095717.GB18551@zion.uk.xensource.com>
Date:	Fri, 16 May 2014 10:57:18 +0100
From:	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
To:	Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@...onical.com>
CC:	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
	Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>,
	<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen-netfront possibly rides the rocket too often

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:48:42AM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 02:14:00PM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote:
> [...]
> > > Wei.
> > > 
> > Reading more of the code I would agree. The definition of MAX_SKB_FRAGS (at
> > least now with compound pages) cannot be used in any way to derive the number of
> > 4k slots a transfer will require.
> > 
> > Zoltan already commented on worst cases. Not sure it would get as bad as that or
> > "just" 16*4k frags all in the middle of compound pages. That would then end in
> > around 33 or 34 slots, depending on the header.
> > 
> > Zoltan wrote:
> > > I think the worst case scenario is when every frag and the linear buffer contains 2 bytes,
> > > which are overlapping a page boundary (that's (17+1)*2=36 so far), plus 15 of
> > them have a 4k
> > > page in the middle of them, so, a 1+4096+1 byte buffer can span over 3 page.
> > > That's 51 individual pages.
> > 
> > I cannot claim to really know what to expect worst case. Somewhat I was thinking
> > of a
> > worst case of (16+1)*2, which would be inconvenient enough.
> > 
> > So without knowing exactly how to do it, but as Ian said it sounds best to come
> > up with some sort of exception coalescing in cases the slot count goes over 18
> > and we know the data size is below 64K.
> > 
> 
> I took a stab at it this morning and came up with this patch. Ran
> redis-benchmark, it seemed to fix that for me -- only saw one "failed to
> linearize skb" during
> 
>   redis-benchmark -h XXX -d 1000 -t lrange
> 
> And before this change, a lot of "rides rocket" were triggered.
> 
> Thought?
> 

And don't take this as a formal patch because I haven't tested it
thoroughly. It's just an idea to coalesce SKBs. We can certainly code
up a loop to do so by ourself.

Wei.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html