lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 18 May 2014 16:50:30 +0200
From:	Bjørn Mork <>
To:	Peter Stuge <>, Enrico Mioso <>
Cc:	David Miller <>,,,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/12] cdc_ncm: add buffer tuning and stats using ethtool

I could be wrong, but my impression is that the userspace API
preferences for network devices are

 1. ethtool
 2. sysfs
 3. module param
 99. ioctl

This is the primary reason why I was looking for someplace to put this
within the existing ethtool API.  Using sysfs would have worked fine
too, I guess.  But is there any real advantage, making it worth a
switch?  I am all open to change to sysfs instead before v3.16 is
released, *if* there are good reasons to do it. And no objections.  But
I do want more of a reason than the fact that it can be done.  Maybe I
got the preferred order wrong?

I ruled out module parameters early because I believe there are real use
cases requiring different settings per device.  The limited host system
resources will of course affect all devices on a single host the same
way.  But not all devices can cope with the reduced buffers. So there
should be some way to tune two devices connected to the same host

I am not going to say anything about ioctls :-)

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists