lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 09:43:25 +0200 From: walter harms <wharms@....de> To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr> CC: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, libertas-dev@...ts.infradead.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/13] libertas: make return of 0 explicit Am 19.05.2014 06:31, schrieb Julia Lawall: > From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr> > > Delete unnecessary local variable whose value is always 0 and that hides > the fact that the result is always 0. > > A simplified version of the semantic patch that fixes this problem is as > follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) > > // <smpl> > @r exists@ > local idexpression ret; > expression e; > position p; > @@ > > -ret = 0; > ... when != ret = e > return > - ret > + 0 > ; > // </smpl> > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr> > > --- > Alternatively, was an error code intended in the bad length case, as is > done in process_brxed_802_11_packet? > > drivers/net/wireless/libertas/rx.c | 7 ++----- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/rx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/rx.c > index c7366b0..807c5b8 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/rx.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/libertas/rx.c > @@ -55,7 +55,6 @@ static int process_rxed_802_11_packet(struct lbs_private *priv, > */ > int lbs_process_rxed_packet(struct lbs_private *priv, struct sk_buff *skb) > { > - int ret = 0; > struct net_device *dev = priv->dev; > struct rxpackethdr *p_rx_pkt; > struct rxpd *p_rx_pd; > @@ -86,7 +85,6 @@ int lbs_process_rxed_packet(struct lbs_private *priv, struct sk_buff *skb) > if (skb->len < (ETH_HLEN + 8 + sizeof(struct rxpd))) { > lbs_deb_rx("rx err: frame received with bad length\n"); > dev->stats.rx_length_errors++; > - ret = 0; > dev_kfree_skb(skb); > goto done; > } > @@ -154,10 +152,9 @@ int lbs_process_rxed_packet(struct lbs_private *priv, struct sk_buff *skb) > else > netif_rx_ni(skb); > > - ret = 0; > done: > - lbs_deb_leave_args(LBS_DEB_RX, "ret %d", ret); > - return ret; > + lbs_deb_leave_args(LBS_DEB_RX, "ret %d", 0); > + return 0; > } i guess lbs_deb_leave_args() is obsolet now. re, wh > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lbs_process_rxed_packet); > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in > the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists