[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140519160652.GE31595@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 19:06:52 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: Xi Wang <xii@...gle.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Maxim Krasnyansky <maxk@....qualcomm.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net-tun: restructure tun_do_read for better
sleep/wakeup efficiency
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 05:27:41PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > @@ -1330,47 +1329,26 @@ done:
> > static ssize_t tun_do_read(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
> > const struct iovec *iv, ssize_t len, int noblock)
> > {
> > - DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
> > struct sk_buff *skb;
> > ssize_t ret = 0;
> > + int peeked, err, off = 0;
> >
> > tun_debug(KERN_INFO, tun, "tun_do_read\n");
> >
> > - if (unlikely(!noblock))
> > - add_wait_queue(&tfile->wq.wait, &wait);
> > - while (len) {
> > - if (unlikely(!noblock))
> > - current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
> > + if (!len)
> > + return ret;
> >
> > - /* Read frames from the queue */
> > - if (!(skb = skb_dequeue(&tfile->socket.sk->sk_receive_queue))) {
> > - if (noblock) {
> > - ret = -EAGAIN;
> > - break;
> > - }
> > - if (signal_pending(current)) {
> > - ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
> > - break;
> > - }
> > - if (tun->dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED) {
> > - ret = -EIO;
> > - break;
> > - }
> > -
> > - /* Nothing to read, let's sleep */
> > - schedule();
> > - continue;
> > - }
> > + if (tun->dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED)
> > + return -EIO;
> >
> > + /* Read frames from queue */
> > + skb = __skb_recv_datagram(tfile->socket.sk, noblock ? MSG_DONTWAIT : 0,
> > + &peeked, &off, &err);
> > + if (skb) {
>
> Still a little bit difference. We check the reg_state after we're sure
> there's nothing left in sk_receive_queue. But this patch returns -EIO
> before trying to dequeue skb.
Yes but what's the concern here? What does userspace do
to notice the change in behaviour?
tun_detach calls tun_queue_purge before unregister_netdevice
so apparently there's never anything in queue when
state isn't registered.
Did I miss something?
--
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists