[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1400520928.30820.23.camel@joe-AO725>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 10:35:28 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Manuel Schölling <manuel.schoelling@....de>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: vxge: Use time_is_before_jiffies() for time
comparison
On Mon, 2014-05-19 at 18:51 +0200, Manuel Schölling wrote:
> To be future-proof and for better readability the time comparisons are modified
> to use time_is_before_jiffies() instead of plain, error-prone math.
Hi again Manuel.
Just a couple of FYIs/nits:
The "net: " prefix in your patch subject is a little
misleading. One reading might be that the patch is
to the net/ subsystem but it's for a driver.
It might be better as:
[PATCH] vxge: Use time_is_before_jiffies
Generally, just use the last directory name
for the subject prefix.
ie: patching: foo/bar/baz/qux.c
subject prefix is generally:
[PATCH] baz: whatever changed...
and a single patch to a number of different files
in foo/bar/baz/*.[ch] is still
[PATCH] baz: etc...
Also, the time_is_(before|after)_jiffies variants
are not used particularly often in the kernel.
The form using of time_<foo>(jiffies, ...)
is used _far_ more often (and it saves a little
typing too).
time_before(<foo>, jiffies)
time_is_before_jiffies(<foo>)
$ git grep -E -w "time_is_(before|after|before_eq|after_eq)_jiffies" | wc -l
93
$ git grep -E "\btime_(before|after|before_eq|after_eq)+\s*\(.*jiffies" | wc -l
1695
<shrug> Maybe there's some reading clarity using
the time_is_(before|after)_jiffies variants.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists