[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <537ADF5C.6040803@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 12:51:40 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: Xi Wang <xii@...gle.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Maxim Krasnyansky <maxk@....qualcomm.com>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net-tun: restructure tun_do_read for better sleep/wakeup
efficiency
On 05/20/2014 12:06 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 05:27:41PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> @@ -1330,47 +1329,26 @@ done:
>>> static ssize_t tun_do_read(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
>>> const struct iovec *iv, ssize_t len, int noblock)
>>> {
>>> - DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, current);
>>> struct sk_buff *skb;
>>> ssize_t ret = 0;
>>> + int peeked, err, off = 0;
>>>
>>> tun_debug(KERN_INFO, tun, "tun_do_read\n");
>>>
>>> - if (unlikely(!noblock))
>>> - add_wait_queue(&tfile->wq.wait, &wait);
>>> - while (len) {
>>> - if (unlikely(!noblock))
>>> - current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
>>> + if (!len)
>>> + return ret;
>>>
>>> - /* Read frames from the queue */
>>> - if (!(skb = skb_dequeue(&tfile->socket.sk->sk_receive_queue))) {
>>> - if (noblock) {
>>> - ret = -EAGAIN;
>>> - break;
>>> - }
>>> - if (signal_pending(current)) {
>>> - ret = -ERESTARTSYS;
>>> - break;
>>> - }
>>> - if (tun->dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED) {
>>> - ret = -EIO;
>>> - break;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> - /* Nothing to read, let's sleep */
>>> - schedule();
>>> - continue;
>>> - }
>>> + if (tun->dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED)
>>> + return -EIO;
>>>
>>> + /* Read frames from queue */
>>> + skb = __skb_recv_datagram(tfile->socket.sk, noblock ? MSG_DONTWAIT : 0,
>>> + &peeked, &off, &err);
>>> + if (skb) {
>> Still a little bit difference. We check the reg_state after we're sure
>> there's nothing left in sk_receive_queue. But this patch returns -EIO
>> before trying to dequeue skb.
>
> Yes but what's the concern here? What does userspace do
> to notice the change in behaviour?
> tun_detach calls tun_queue_purge before unregister_netdevice
> so apparently there's never anything in queue when
> state isn't registered.
> Did I miss something?
>
>From rollback_registered_many(), ndo_uninit() was called after reg_state
was changed to NETREG_UNREGISTERING. So userspace could read something
in the small window. Not sure it was a problem, but it does have minor
difference.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists