[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140521065605.0955afb7@samsung-9>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 06:56:05 +0900
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Fw: [Bug 76521] New: no-blocking socket can send data through
non-existent local port
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 18:21:19 -0700
From: "bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org" <bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org>
To: "stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: [Bug 76521] New: no-blocking socket can send data through non-existent local port
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76521
Bug ID: 76521
Summary: no-blocking socket can send data through non-existent
local port
Product: Networking
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 3.11.0-15
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: P1
Component: IPV4
Assignee: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org
Reporter: billhong1998@...il.com
Regression: No
Created attachment 136811
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=136811&action=edit
Run code to reproduce the issue
The attached code is a epoll network client supposed to test a network server
in high traffic case. Multiple threads create non-blocking sockets to simulate
heavy network load. Most sockets work well, but occasionally some sockets can
send data via non-existent local port, and can read data from the port as well.
Maybe I am not acquainted enough with epoll networking programming, and even
not sure if it is a bug in no-blocking i/o or epoll, and also not certain which
websites are the right place to discuss epoll or no-blocking i/o technologies.
Anyone has any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists