netdev - Re: [ath9k-devel] randconfig build error with next-20140519, in drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <537CB066.1070803@neratec.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 May 2014 15:55:50 +0200
From:	Zefir Kurtisi <zefir.kurtisi@...atec.com>
To:	Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>,
	Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@....qualcomm.com>
CC:	Jim Davis <jim.epost@...il.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linville <linville@...driver.com>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	ath9k-devel@...ts.ath9k.org, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] randconfig build error with next-20140519, in drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c

Hi,

sorry, I posted a related patch today ('[PATCH] ath9k: fix build error with
disabled debug'), but seems did not manage to set the correct in-reply-to field.


On 05/21/2014 02:12 PM, Julian Calaby wrote:
> Hi Rajkumar,
> 
> On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:01 PM, Rajkumar Manoharan
> <rmanohar@....qualcomm.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 09:31:16AM -0700, Jim Davis wrote:
>>> Building with the attached random configuration file,
>>>
>>> In file included from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/eeprom.h:22:0,
>>>                  from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/hw.h:27,
>>>                  from drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c:18:
>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c: In function ‘ath9k_dfs_process_phyerr’:
>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c:185:14: error: ‘struct ath_softc’
>>> has no member named ‘debug’
>>>     pe.ts - sc->debug.stats.dfs_stats.last_ts);
>>>               ^
>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/../ath.h:273:41: note: in definition of
>>> macro ‘ath_dbg’
>>>    ath_printk(KERN_DEBUG, common, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
>>>                                          ^
>>> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.c:186:5: error: ‘struct ath_softc’
>>> has no member named ‘debug’
>>>    sc->debug.stats.dfs_stats.last_ts = pe.ts;
>>>      ^
>>> make[5]: *** [drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/dfs.o] Error 1
>>
>> Please select CONFIG_ATH9K_DEBUGFS.
> 
> The point of randconfig builds is to ensure that there it's really
> unlikely that there are any config combinations that don't build, even
> if they're utterly insane.
> 
> You should really change the ath9k Kconfig rules or move or add ifdefs
> to prevent this from being possible.
> 
> Thanks,
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html