[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <537E5C4D.4040209@mentor.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 21:21:33 +0100
From: Jim Baxter <jim_baxter@...tor.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, <kamal@...onical.com>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <mszeredi@...e.cz>, <fw@...len.de>
Subject: Re: skbuff truesize incorrect.
On 22/05/14 20:59, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-05-22 at 20:39 +0100, Jim Baxter wrote:
>
>> I now think that the correct solution here is to create a new smaller
>> skb and copy the data from the sub packets into it.
>
> For low speed devices, this is indeed the best way.
>
> (this is called copybreak in some nic drivers)
>
>
>
Thank you Eric.
It is USB device that can handle 480Mbits/s so a middle speed device.
It looks like it is the normal trade off of speed versus memory. Either
I can use skb_clone for speed but that will impact memory with multiple
skb's of 16k or I copy the data to keep the memory usage low. Though
copying 2k of data into an skb will not likely be a massive overhead.
Jim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists