[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <537E4884.7060205@pandora.be>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 20:57:08 +0200
From: Bart De Schuymer <bdschuym@...dora.be>
To: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: Revert 462fb2af9788a82a534f8184abfde31574e1cfa0 (bridge : Sanitize
skb before it enters the IP stack)
David Newall schreef op 22/05/2014 5:50:
> On 22/05/14 04:21, Bart De Schuymer wrote:
>> As for your other remark: as I've said before, if you don't like
>> bridge-netfilter then don't compile it into your kernel.
>
> That's not very helpful. I could say, with just as much merit, that it
> should be marked deprecated (so that it's not compiled into distribution
> kernels) and you can compile it into yours.
>
> What I dislike is that bridge-netfilter is faulty.
I can see this may be frustrating to many. Now and then I actually got
some positive feedback :-) Anyway, since I didn't have much sleep last
night I'll be brief.
I'm fine with deprecating ebtables/bridge-nf. The code is over a decade
old and development hasn't really picked up speed after I diverted my
spare time to other things.
From now on I'm no longer wasting my spare time on involvement in
bridge-nf/ebtables. Anyone that wants to step up to take over the git
repository (also contains arptables userspace app) can please contact me
by private mail.
Best regards,
Bart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists