netdev - Re: skbuff truesize incorrect.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 23 May 2014 10:21:19 +0100
From:	Jim Baxter <jim_baxter@...tor.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <kamal@...onical.com>,
	<bhutchings@...arflare.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	<mszeredi@...e.cz>, <fw@...len.de>
Subject: Re: skbuff truesize incorrect.

On 22/05/14 21:58, David Miller wrote:
> From: Jim Baxter <jim_baxter@...tor.com>
> Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 21:21:55 +0100
> 
>> If there are multiple clones for an skb all pointing at the same data,
>> will that distort the memory used when they all have the same truesize?
> 
> What is distorted about it?
> 
> Each clone references exactly that much backing memory.
>

Thank you for you help, I think distorted was the wrong word.


I think I am confused what truesize is used for it looks like it is used
to deallocate memory, is this correct?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html