lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140523104045.501bba04@samsung-9>
Date:	Fri, 23 May 2014 10:40:45 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Fw: [Bug 76791] New: Problem with esp sequence and anti-replay
 window logic.



Begin forwarded message:

Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 00:22:53 -0700
From: "bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org" <bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org>
To: "stephen@...workplumber.org" <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Subject: [Bug 76791] New: Problem with esp sequence and anti-replay window logic.


https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76791

            Bug ID: 76791
           Summary: Problem with esp sequence and anti-replay window
                    logic.
           Product: Networking
           Version: 2.5
    Kernel Version: 2.6.34
          Hardware: All
                OS: Linux
              Tree: Mainline
            Status: NEW
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P1
         Component: Other
          Assignee: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org
          Reporter: bhargav.1226@...il.com
        Regression: No

Hi,

As the esp sequence number is a 32 bit field in the ESP packet, the maximum
sequence number could be 4294967295 [as 2^32 is 4294967296], then after the
sender will send the esp sequence starting from 1 again.

Lets say a scenario, if there is a huge traffic continously and the esp
sequence number reaches the maximum, and for the next packets the esp sequence
will be 1. 
The highest sequence number received will be 4294967295.

But the anti-replay logic will check the difference of the highest sequence
number  till that time and the sequence number of the received packet. In this
case the difference  will be greater than the replay window size. There is a
chance of dropping of packets.

Seems it is a bug. Do we have to fix the anti-replay window to cycle the
highest sequence like the sender is doing for the esp sequence number?

Thanks,
Bhargav

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ