netdev - Re: Revert 462fb2af9788a82a534f8184abfde31574e1cfa0 (bridge : Sanitize skb before it enters the IP stack)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140524.230202.372276424258120234.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Sat, 24 May 2014 23:02:02 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	davidn@...idnewall.com
Cc:	bdschuym@...dora.be, fw@...len.de, stephen@...workplumber.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, bsd@...hat.com,
	vyasevich@...il.com
Subject: Re: Revert 462fb2af9788a82a534f8184abfde31574e1cfa0 (bridge :
 Sanitize skb before it enters the IP stack)

From: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 12:02:03 +0930

> On 25/05/14 03:13, David Miller wrote:
>> This patch was substantially corrupted by your email client.
> 
> We should be sending these things as mime attachments.  Having to put
> patches inline is brittle, absurd and a waste of everyone's time.  Is
> there actually anybody here who doesn't have a mime-compatible MUA?

It makes replying and commenting inline easy.

It's not our problem that so many email clients make sending
plain unmolested ASCII text difficult.  But at least we've gone
out of our way to document how to do so in the kernel tree.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html