netdev - Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: hisilicon: add hix5hd2 mac driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53840D40.3000600@linaro.org>
Date:	Tue, 27 May 2014 11:57:52 +0800
From:	zhangfei <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	davem@...emloft.net, f.fainelli@...il.com,
	sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com, mark.rutland@....com,
	David.Laight@...lab.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	haifeng.yan@...aro.org, jchxue@...il.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: hisilicon: add hix5hd2 mac driver

Hi Arnd,

Thanks for the kind suggestions.

On 05/26/2014 10:51 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 19 May 2014, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
>
> I only noticed one real issue with the driver:
>
>> +struct hix5hd2_desc {
>> +	__le32 buff_addr;
>> +	__le32 buff_len:11;
>> +	__le32 reserve2:5;
>> +	__le32 data_len:11;
>> +	__le32 reserve1:2;
>> +	__le32 fl:2;
>> +	__le32 descvid:1;
>> +} __aligned(32);
>> +
>
> You should generall not use bitfields in hardware data structures, as that is
> not endian safe and will prevent running a big-endian kernel on this machine.
> Better convert this to a set of __le32 fields and explicit shifts and masks.

Got it, will update.

More knowledge about big-endian kernel is appreciated, in which case we 
should consider such kernel.
Can we only consider this driver is only running on arm, which is 
little-endian.

>
> Two smaller things you should think about, I'm not entirely sure about these:
>
>> +static int hix5hd2_rx(struct net_device *dev, int limit)
>> +{
>> +	struct hix5hd2_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
>> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
>> +	struct hix5hd2_desc *desc;
>> +	dma_addr_t dma_addr;
>> +	u32 start, end, num, pos, i, len;
>> +
>> +	/* software read pointer */
>> +	start = dma_cnt(readl_relaxed(priv->base + RX_BQ_RD_ADDR));
>> +	/* logic write pointer */
>> +	end = dma_cnt(readl_relaxed(priv->base + RX_BQ_WR_ADDR));
>
> I think one of these needs to be readl() instead of readl_relaxed(),
> to ensure the data is correctly ordered with regard to the pointer
> access.
readl_relaxed can ensure the sequence.

>
>> +	if (pos != start)
>> +		writel(dma_byte(pos), priv->base + TX_RQ_RD_ADDR);
>
> While this looks like it could be writel_relaxed().
>
En, I think all three cases can use xxx_relaxed.
These accesses are just update pointer used by internal logic and get 
pointer updated by internal logic.

Thanks

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html