[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140527093713.512824b0@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 09:37:13 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
wkok@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Add bridge ifindex to bridge fdb notify msgs
On Mon, 26 May 2014 21:39:46 -0700
roopa@...ulusnetworks.com wrote:
> From: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
>
> This patch adds NDA_MASTER attribute to neighbour attributes enum for
> bridge/master ifindex. And adds NDA_MASTER to bridge fdb notify msgs.
>
> Today bridge fdb notifications dont contain bridge information.
> Userspace can derive it from the port information in the fdb
> notification. However this is tricky in some scenarious.
>
> Example, bridge port delete notification comes before bridge fdb
> delete notifications. And we have seen problems in userspace
> when using libnl where, the bridge fdb delete notification handling code
> does not understand which bridge this fdb entry is part of because
> the bridge and port association has already been deleted.
> And these notifications (port membership and fdb) are generated on
> separate rtnl groups.
>
> Fixing the order of notifications could possibly solve the problem
> for some cases (I can submit a separate patch for that).
>
> This patch chooses to add NDA_MASTER to bridge fdb notify msgs
> because it not only solves the problem described above, but also helps
> userspace avoid another lookup into link msgs to derive the master index.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/neighbour.h | 1 +
> net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/neighbour.h b/include/uapi/linux/neighbour.h
> index d3ef583..4a1d7e9 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/neighbour.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/neighbour.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ enum {
> NDA_PORT,
> NDA_VNI,
> NDA_IFINDEX,
> + NDA_MASTER,
> __NDA_MAX
> };
>
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
> index 9203d5a..019bb93 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
> @@ -565,6 +565,8 @@ static int fdb_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct net_bridge *br,
>
> if (nla_put(skb, NDA_LLADDR, ETH_ALEN, &fdb->addr))
> goto nla_put_failure;
> + if (nla_put_u32(skb, NDA_MASTER, br->dev->ifindex))
> + goto nla_put_failure;
> ci.ndm_used = jiffies_to_clock_t(now - fdb->used);
> ci.ndm_confirmed = 0;
> ci.ndm_updated = jiffies_to_clock_t(now - fdb->updated);
> @@ -586,6 +588,7 @@ static inline size_t fdb_nlmsg_size(void)
> {
> return NLMSG_ALIGN(sizeof(struct ndmsg))
> + nla_total_size(ETH_ALEN) /* NDA_LLADDR */
> + + nla_total_size(sizeof(u32)) /* NDA_MASTER */
> + nla_total_size(sizeof(u16)) /* NDA_VLAN */
> + nla_total_size(sizeof(struct nda_cacheinfo));
> }
I like the idea of this, but the new attribute needs to be part of the set
as well as notify and display infrastructure.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists