netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] devicetree: bindings: Properly document micrel ks8851 SPI chips

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140528194913.GI5099@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Wed, 28 May 2014 20:49:13 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] devicetree: bindings: Properly document micrel
 ks8851 SPI chips

On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:44:35PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 05/28/14 10:12, Mark Brown wrote:

> > If the supply must always be physically present the bindings should be
> > specified as it being mandatory and the code written in that fashion; as
> > an extension Linux will put a dummy in but this is attempting to handle
> > incorrect DTs.  This means we have functional error handling in cases
> > where there is something to worry about and simplifies the code using
> > the regulator.

> Ok, you're saying the opposite of Rob. Should it be required or optional
> in the DT binding?

I'm saying it should be required.  The implementation accepts it as an
extension (a recent extension at that).

> Ok. Dave M has already picked up all these patches so I'll send a patch
> to replace regulator_get_optional() with regulator_get() and fix up the
> error handling unless I hear otherwise.

Yes, please.  I'm much more worried about the abuse of
regulator_get_optional() than the binding.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)