lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 29 May 2014 08:17:07 +0000
From:	"fugang.duan@...escale.com" <fugang.duan@...escale.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
CC:	'Frank Li' <lznuaa@...il.com>,
	"Frank.Li@...escale.com" <Frank.Li@...escale.com>,
	"shawn.guo@...aro.org" <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 5/7] net:fec: add support for dumping transmit
	ring on timeout

Hi, Russell,

From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> Data: Tuesday, April 29, 2014 10:38 PM
>To: David Laight
>Cc: 'Frank Li'; Li Frank-B20596; shawn.guo@...aro.org; Duan Fugang-B38611;
>davem@...emloft.net; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
>netdev@...r.kernel.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/7] net:fec: add support for dumping
>transmit ring on timeout
>
>On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 02:23:09PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
>> From: Frank Li [mailto:lznuaa@...il.com]
>> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:01 AM, David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
>wrote:
>> > > From: Frank ...
>> > >> > You probably want the read and write indexes as well.
>> > >>
>> > >>                      bdp == fep->cur_tx ? 'S' : ' ',
>> > >>                      bdp == fep->dirty_tx ? 'H' : ' ',
>> > >>
>> > >> Above code already print read and write index. 'S', 'H'
>> > >
>> > > Gah I must be asleep!
>> > > Something made be think that was to do with the ring ownership bit!
>> >
>> > I think it is same thing. If I am wrong, please tell me difference.
>>
>> The ownership bit in the ring flags - that the hardware uses.
>> Which are printed in the next field.
>>
>> I'm guessing that the reason the tx ring is 'interesting' is that
>> there have been bugs where the driver and hardware disagree about
>> which entry each should process next.
>> Otherwise the full tx ring is likely to be very very boring.
>
>There have been several bugs.
>
>One is where the ring is completely owned by software (because all the
>entries have been transmitted) but the driver is buggy and hasn't reaped
>the ring at all, leading to a tx timeout.
>
>The second one is where the ring appears to be completely full, because
>the hardware hasn't been transmitting for various reasons (eg, there are
>bugs in the way the transmitter is started.)
>
>The third one is where the transmitter skips a ring entry on earlier iMX
>hardware.
>
>However, those are specific bugs.  The point of dumping the whole ring is
>to allow bugs to be diagnosed, because we can then see the state of the
>ring, and start looking for likely causes of the symptoms that are visible.
>With the driver as it currently is, the only thing we know is "oops, the
>transmit seemed to stop for some reason" and we hope that resetting the
>device gets it going again - after many seconds of it being non-responsive.
>
>This is how I've sorted out many issues with this driver.
>

I see linux next and net "imx_v6_v7_defconfig" don't enable "CONFIG_CMA", if you enable the feature,
Fec issue may disapper. I tested it with the config, fec BD dma coherent issue, watchdog timeout issue don't happen.

I attach the document (not secretive), you can glance over them.
The issue happened on imx6q/dl fec, usb, audio...

Thanks,
Andy

Download attachment "i.MX6 dma memory bufferable  issue.pptx" of type "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.presentationml.presentation" (983557 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists