[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140530225048.GA24100@f1.synalogic.ca>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 15:50:48 -0700
From: Benjamin Poirier <benjamin.poirier@...il.com>
To: Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, nhorman@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] cnic: Don't take cnic_dev_lock in
cnic_alloc_uio_rings()
On 2014/05/30 16:18, Michael Chan wrote:
> We are allocating memory with GFP_KERNEL under spinlock. Since this is
> the only call manipulating the cnic_udev_list and it is always under
> rtnl_lock, cnic_dev_lock can be safely removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <mchan@...adcom.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/cnic.c | 6 ------
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/cnic.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/cnic.c
> index 7f40a2c..4ebab75 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/cnic.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/cnic.c
> @@ -1039,21 +1039,17 @@ static int cnic_alloc_uio_rings(struct cnic_dev *dev, int pages)
> struct cnic_local *cp = dev->cnic_priv;
> struct cnic_uio_dev *udev;
>
> - read_lock(&cnic_dev_lock);
> list_for_each_entry(udev, &cnic_udev_list, list) {
> if (udev->pdev == dev->pcidev) {
> udev->dev = dev;
> if (__cnic_alloc_uio_rings(udev, pages)) {
> udev->dev = NULL;
> - read_unlock(&cnic_dev_lock);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
> cp->udev = udev;
> - read_unlock(&cnic_dev_lock);
> return 0;
> }
> }
> - read_unlock(&cnic_dev_lock);
>
> udev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct cnic_uio_dev), GFP_ATOMIC);
Oh, and you could also make the above GFP_KERNEL. Sorry for not
mentioning it in my previous mail.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists