[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140529.220801.2111563710536999957.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 22:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jhs@...atatu.com
Cc: ben@...adent.org.uk, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
stephen@...workplumber.org, vyasevic@...hat.com,
john.r.fastabend@...el.com, sfeldma@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v2 1/1] bring netlink interface to par with
brctl show macs
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 07:05:01 -0400
> On 05/25/14 22:35, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> On Sun, 2014-05-25 at 09:15 -0400, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>
>>> + if (dev == NULL) {
>>> + pr_info("PF_BRIDGE: RTM_GETNEIGH with unknown ifindex\n");
>>
>> You left another debug message here.
>>
>>> + return -ENODEV;
>>> }
>
>>> + pr_info("PF_BRIDGE: RTM_GETNEIGH %s no dumper\n",
>>> + dev->name);
>>
>> And here.
>
> Those two just adhere to the coding style used in the rest of the fdb
> code. I could remove them and send subsequent patches to remove
> equivalent debugs in the rest of the code. To me they seem useful
> although i have seen very strong views against them in the past.
I think we have to get rid of these, because they are essentially
user triggerable.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists