[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140601133421.GQ15585@mwanda>
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2014 16:34:21 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: walter harms <wharms@....de>
Cc: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <samuel@...tiz.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/11] via-ircc: Remove useless return variables
On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 01:42:30PM +0200, walter harms wrote:
> >> static int via_ircc_read_dongle_id(int iobase)
> >> -{
> >> - int dongle_id = 9; /* Default to IBM */
> >> -
> >> +{/* Default to IBM */
> >
> > Yuck. And anyway, the comment should be on return line. (And of course
> > there should have been a #define IBM_DONGLE_ID 9, but that's probably
> > something for another patch.
> >
> >> IRDA_ERROR("via-ircc: dongle probing not supported, please specify dongle_id module parameter.\n");
> >> - return dongle_id;
> >> + return 9;
>
>
> more over code and error msg do not fit,
> it returns a default of 9 (what ever that means) it does not look like
> an error. Sow the warning should be
>
> via-ircc: dongle probing not supported, please specify dongle_id module parameter. settting dongle_id=9
>
The print is ok. It's called like this:
328 /* Check if user has supplied the dongle id or not */
329 if (!dongle_id)
330 dongle_id = via_ircc_read_dongle_id(self->io.fir_base);
331 self->io.dongle_id = dongle_id;
If you don't use a module id then it acts like an IBM dongle by default.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists