netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH 2/2] bridge netlink dump interface at par with brctl Actually better than brctl showmacs because we can filter by bridge port in the kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <538CF80E.5010009@mojatatu.com>
Date:	Mon, 02 Jun 2014 18:17:50 -0400
From:	Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To:	vyasevic@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	stephen@...workplumber.org
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, sfeldma@...ulusnetworks.com,
	john.r.fastabend@...el.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 2/2] bridge netlink dump interface at par with
 brctl Actually better than brctl showmacs because we can filter by bridge
 port in the kernel

On 06/02/14 11:34, Vlad Yasevich wrote:

>
> I think that after this code, if you set a bridge mac address thus
> causing an fdb like:
>    <mac> dev br0 vlan 0 master permanent  (old notation)
>
> you will not show it if you set the br_idx with
>    # bridge fdb show br br0
>
>
> I looks like the only way to show such fdb is not set any filters at all
> since if you set a port filter, you will not see it either as it will be
> filtered out in bridge code.
>

I thought the comment which says "selfie" would take care of that; i.e
the default dump would do it.
If you give me an example of setting such an entry I will try it out
and see if it works.

cheers,
jamal

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html