[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <538E319B.3000606@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:35:39 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Chema Gonzalez <chema@...gle.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 0/2] split BPF out of core networking
On 06/03/2014 05:44 PM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
...
> All of your points are valid. They are right questions to ask. I just
> don't see why you're still arguing about first step of filter.c split,
> whereas your concerns are about steps 2, 3, 4.
Fair enough, lets keep them in mind though for future work. Btw,
are other files planned for kernel/bpf/ or should it instead just
simply be kernel/bpf.c?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists