[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <538D364E.6040605@renesas.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 11:43:26 +0900
From: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
To: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>, <cm-hiep@...so.co.jp>
CC: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Subject: Re: Ethernet bug at Upstream-v3.15-rcx on Lager.
Hi Ben,
(2014/05/30 23:04), Ben Dooks wrote:
> On 16/05/14 06:56, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
>> Hi Hiep-san,
>>
>> (2014/05/16 10:08), カオ ミン ヒェップ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Please review it when you have time.
>>>>
>>>> Please try this patch:
>>>>
>>>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=139602519809181
>>>>
>>> I have tested this patch on v3.15.0-rc5-00077-g14186fe, and results are the message of
>>> "sh-eth r8a7790-ether eth0: Receive FIFO Overflow" has disappeared and sending datagrams is good.
>>> (Bandwidth 10M to 100M: Test with 5/5 times by script and by hand are good)
>>>
>>
>> It's nice!
>> So, I hope the patch is merged in upstream.
>> However, the patch's change log mentioned r8a7790 only.
>> The r8a7791's ethernet controller also has this bit.
>
> The bit update covers both of them as the r8a7790 and r8a7791 both share
> the same configuration structure.
>
> I re-sent the patch but didn't find your email post until after I had
> sent it, otherwise I would have mentioned your testing specifically. In
> future it would be helpful if you could do the following
>
> - Mention driver by name in the subject line
> - Search the list for previous mentions and reply to that/those threads.
>
Thank you very much for the comment and your v2 patch!
I understood it.
Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists