[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1401781509-6435-8-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2014 00:45:09 -0700
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: Manuel Schölling <manuel.schoelling@....de>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, gospo@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: [net-next 7/7] e1000: Use time_after() for time comparison
From: Manuel Schölling <manuel.schoelling@....de>
To be future-proof and for better readability the time comparisons are modified
to use time_after() instead of plain, error-prone math.
Signed-off-by: Manuel Schölling <manuel.schoelling@....de>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c
index 341889a..08b207d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c
@@ -1460,7 +1460,8 @@ static int e1000_run_loopback_test(struct e1000_adapter *adapter)
* enough time to complete the receives, if it's
* exceeded, break and error off
*/
- } while (good_cnt < 64 && jiffies < (time + 20));
+ } while (good_cnt < 64 && time_after(time + 20, jiffies));
+
if (good_cnt != 64) {
ret_val = 13; /* ret_val is the same as mis-compare */
break;
--
1.9.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists