lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHA+R7N74QODqvWyvP1gHsK2dm_Zgrkq0+k8LZnqnA8EqnMOZw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 4 Jun 2014 17:27:17 -0700
From:	Cong Wang <cwang@...pensource.com>
To:	Alex <d77190@...l.ru>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Bug 75571

On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 1:31 AM, Alex <d77190@...l.ru> wrote:
>> Could you try the following patch? We need to call skb_cow_head() before
>> skb_push().
> This patch solves problem, no panic or any error messages.
> Thank you.
>

Thanks for testing!

Thinking a bit more, the question is why
skb_push(skb->dev->hard_header_len) is not correct here? It looks
like we don't calculate tunnel->dev->hard_header_len correctly. But
ipip_tunnel_bind_dev() should do the right thing less your setup is not
correct, in that case your ipip tunnel should not receive any packet.
We should be safe.

Which is the interface routing to 192.168.18.17 on your system? Which
driver does it use?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ